Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 2, 1938No. 31,616PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission overruling a demurrer to respondent’s claim petition for benefits under the workmen’s compensation act as widow and sole dependent of one Alfred Johnson.

In the course of his employment by relator, Johnson was accidentally injured on July 25, 1926. Upon the termination of voluntary payments by relator, Johnson instituted proceedings to recover additional benefits. The referee found him to be permanently partially disabled and awarded compensation for 300 weeks. In 1928 the parties agreed to a lump sum settlement of $2,000, which was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Carlson v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Nyberg v. Little Falls Black Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Glassman v. RadtkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Laird v. State of Vermont Highway Dept.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  5. Carroll v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API