St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
This is an appeal by the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway from a judgment of the Court of Claims which disallowed three claims for transportation furnished to the War Department. 59. Ct. Cl. 82. That the claims were originally valid is conceded. The defense as to each is that recovery has been barred by discharge. As to two of the claims, by § 178 of the Judicial Code. As to the third, by the rule declared in Oregon-Washington R. R. & Navigation Co. v. United States, 255 U. S. 339. Whether on the facts found the statute and the rule apply, are the questions for decision.
First. The two…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Norris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lutz v. Frick Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.