Legal Opinion

State v. Cardenas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1996No. 62785-1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pekelis, J.P.T.*

— The State seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision reversing the trial court’s imposition of *4an exceptional sentence in a vehicular assault case. The Court of Appeals concluded that the factors of multiple and serious injuries, particular vulnerability of the victim, and particularly egregious conduct do not justify the exceptional sentence imposed. Although we agree with the Court of Appeals that the trial court improperly relied on the factors of multiple and serious injuries and egregious conduct, we hold that the factor of victim vulnerability was properly applied by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SuleimanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API