Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Porter v. Fiske

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1946No. Civ. 15234PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This case presents another of the many stratagems and subterfuges more or less ingeniously devised to evade the rent restrictions and regulations imposed by the Office of Price Administration. The complaint alleges that appellant owns a dwelling house in the Los Angeles Defense-Rental Area, the maximum legal rental of which was fixed in accordance with law by the Office of Price Administration at $40 per month; that in November, 1944, she leased the dwelling to tenants for six months at the maximum lawful rental, and at the same time demanded and received the additional sum of $210 from them.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Henderson v. BurdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Thierry v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Coit Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Nuffer v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Topanga Beach Renters Ass'n v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. Mel MacK Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. De Armas v. DickermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API