Knisley v. Bowman
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This action was originally brought to enjoin defendant from “absconding with income tax refunds of individuals without providing rudimentary due process.” Essentially, plaintiffs challenge the State of Michigan’s state tax refund intercept program, whereby the Michigan Department of Treasury (MDT) acts as a collection agent for all state agencies with monetary claims against individuals who file state income tax returns. Some time ago the court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Knisley v. Monroe, 539…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kandlbinder v. ReagenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
- Anderson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Anderson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Whispering Pines Afc, Home, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wightman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988