Legal Opinion
Anderson v. White
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 6, 1989No. 89-1275PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Ronald Anderson (Anderson), Paul Jenkins (Jenkins) and James Campbell (Campbell) are fathers who have an obligation to support their children under Pennsylvania law.1 Because Pennsylvania *987court records showed they were delinquent in meeting their obligations as embodied in state court orders, that state sought to intercept the fathers’ federal tax refunds and apply them to their child support delinquencies, pursuant to federal statute and the state’s Tax Refund Intercept Program (TRIP). The fathers challenged the state’s operation of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Town of Randolph v. Estate of WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In re GravesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Games v. CavazosDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Purity Products, Inc. v. Tropicana Products, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
- Nelson v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.