Legal Opinion

Lucier v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 1, 2018No. 16-865Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nos. 16-865L, 16-893L Filed: June 1, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ANDREW S. LUCIER, et al., * THOMAS E. BEATTIE, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Cross-Motion for Partial Summary v. Judgment; Fifth Amendment * * Taking; Rails to Trails; Prescriptive UNITED STATES, Easement; Fee Simple Interest; * * Easement; Deed Interpretation; Plat Defendant. Interpretation * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * John R. Sears, Baker Sterchi Cowden and Rice, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs in Lucier et al. v. United States, Case No. 16-865L. Of counsel was Jacqueline D. Gebhardt, Baker Sterchi Cowden and Rice,…

2Cases cited226 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API