Allen v. Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Monte Allen, George Kasper, and Danco International Oil & Gas, Inc. (collectively Allen) obtained oil and gas exploration leases in 1986. Allen retained the overriding royalty interest while the working interest in the leases was transferred to several oil companies, eventually coming under the sole control of ConocoPhillips. Although the leases are near the state's most productive gas field, the North Cook Inlet Unit (NCIU), no oil or gas has been produced from the leases. One day before the leases were to expire, Allen petitioned the Alaska Oil and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Allen v. ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERV. COM'NAlaska Supreme Court · 2006