Legal Opinion

Trowbridge v. McCaigue

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2010No. 1965 WDA 2008PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Harold Trowbridge (Appellant) appeals from the order granting Richard and Mary McCaigue’s (Appellees) motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant claims that the trial court erred in granting the motion because the parties had entered into a contract for the sale of real estate, which Appellees breached, thereby entitling Appellant to specific performance. For the following reasons, we reverse.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of this case as follows:

Harold Trowbridge (Plaintiff) initiated the present suit on April 16, 2008 against Richard and Mary McCaigue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. GMH Associates, Inc. v. Prudential Realty GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Hessenthaler v. FarzinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Highland Sewer & Water Authority v. Forest Hills Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Zuk v. ZukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Nolt v. TS Calkins & Associates, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Liberties Lofts LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Telecommunications Network Design v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API