Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1964No. [App. No. 53, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

236 Md. 639 (1964)

204 A.2d 563

RANSOM

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 53, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

2Per curiam

This application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief contains no statement of reasons, as required by Maryland Rule BK46 b, and must be dismissed on that ground. Cf. Murel v. Director, 231 Md. 661. In any event, we think the opinion of Judge Grady in the court below dealt fully and adequately with all of the contentions raised in his…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murel v. Director of the Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. McDonald v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Greene v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. McDonald v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API