Legal Opinion

Owen v. Kessler

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 15, 2002No. Nos. 01-P-32 & 01-P-184PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.

The lesson to be learned from this real estate deal gone bad is a simple one: a “time is of the essence” clause *467means that contractual deadlines will be strictly enforced. A waiver of a deadline will not be found unless one is demonstrated by the actions of the parties. See McCarthy v. Tobin, 429 Mass. 84, 88-89 (1999).

As Owen was deciding whether she could afford to purchase the property,3 Wardle himself was contemplating expansion. Deciding to expand, but wishing to remain anonymous, Wardle acted through a broker, Thomas Patten, and an attorney and friend from New York, Christopher Zito.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Church of God in Christ, Inc. v. Congregation Kehillath JacobMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Vickery v. WaltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Coldwell Banker/Hunneman v. ShostackMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Coviello v. RichardsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Perroncello v. DonahueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. 201 Forest Street LLC v. LBM Financial LLC (In Re 201 Forest Street LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API