Legal Opinion
Vickery v. Walton
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 15, 1989No. 88-P-61PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Once again we are confronted with fallout from the use of a written offer to purchase form as a prelude to execution of an agreement to buy real estate. See Goren v. Royal Invs. Inc., 25 Mass. App. Ct. 137, 140-143 (1987); Blomendale v. Imbrescia, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 144, 147 (1987); Nelsen v. Rebello, ante 270, 272-274 (1988).
The governing facts were found by a Superior Court judge who sat without jury. We flesh them out from undisputed material in the record. At the instigation of the plaintiff Charles Vickery, who desired to buy a dwelling house at 104 West Third Street in South Boston, a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Powers v. LenoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Goldhor v. Hampshire CollegeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Limpus v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Davis v. Dawson, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Owen v. KesslerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Perroncello v. DonahueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.