Legal Opinion
Coldwell Banker/Hunneman v. Shostack
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 7, 2004No. 03-P-1572PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.
The plaintiff, Coldwell Banker/Hunneman, a real estate broker, sought in this action to recover a commission under a contract with the defendant, Malka Lifshitz Shostack1 (also referred to as the seller), who was the owner of a home in *636Brookline (property). The plaintiff appeals from the allowance by a judge of the Superior Court of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Facts. The facts material to the issues raised in this appeal were undisputed and set forth in the summary judgment materials of the parties. The plaintiff and defendant executed a real estate brokerage agreement which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Tristram's Landing, Inc. v. WaitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. Norwood Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Perroncello v. DonahueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- GABRIELE FARIELLO v. LIN ZHAO & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Oxford Business Brokers, Inc. v. MoriartyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.