Legal Opinion
United States v. Adnan Manni
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1987No. 86-1007PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
Indicted on four counts as a felon in possession of a firearm, Adnan Manni pled guilty to count three, receiving an A.K.S. semi-automatic rifle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h)(a), pursuant to a Rule 11 agreement. Defendant was sentenced to five years, the statutory maximum as well as the maximum permitted under the plea agreement. The most significant of the numerous questions raised in this appeal is whether the district court’s “technical failure” to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(D) requires a remand for resentencing. Having concluded that the evidence indicates that the district court has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. James P. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Richard Charles Ruip v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Juan Manuel IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Joseph FreedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Paul R. Edgecomb (88-3853) and Gordon R. Edgecomb (88-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Frederick H. MandellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Phillip S. FryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Larry PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Leonard SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.