Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip S. Fry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1987No. 86-4094PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
The significant question in this case is whether the district court fulfilled the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D), Fed.R. Crim.P., in sentencing the defendant. The case reaches us on appeal from the denial of a motion for resentencing, withdrawal of guilty plea, or reduction of sentence.
I
Defendant Phillip Fry was charged in a seventeen-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) and other tax-related offenses. The underlying allegation in the indictment was that Fry and a codefendant were selling illegal tax shelters.
During pretrial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Michael I. MonusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Daryl E. Ratliff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Phillip Fry, Susan Fry v. Olin Melaragno, David W. Otto, Mark Barnes, Mark PenderyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Chauncy Adam Tucker (95-1160) Calvin Miller, Jr. (95-1187) and Anthony Darrick McCoy (95-1220)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.