Legal Opinion
Richard Charles Ruip v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1977No. 76-1505PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents four issues:
1. ) Whether the promulgation of parole guidelines by the United States Parole Commission violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws when applied retroactively;
2. ) Whether the application of the parole guidelines to a prisoner sentenced before their issuance violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure;
3. ) Whether due process of law required that a prisoner be allowed an opportunity to provide supplemental information to the Parole Commission regarding his “salient factor score”; and
4. ) Whether a prisoner’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sidney F. Brown, Jr. v. David C. Lundgren, Warden, Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Russ' Kwik Car Wash, Inc. Clean Cars, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Company Gastown, Inc. Emro Marketing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Earl Ellery Wright v. United States Board of Parole and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- John J. Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission and Metropolitan Correctional Center, Robert Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Lyman T. Shepard v. Larry Taylor, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, and Maurice Sigler, Chairman, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.