Legal Opinion

State v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1913No. 2362PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Questions certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth District, in an appeal from Howard County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

This case involves the constitutionality of the Act of the Thirty-first Legislature, chapter 96, page 175, commonly known as the Water Closet Law. The validity of the Act was sustained by the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals, 143 S. W., 223; but upon the motion of the appellee, it has certified to us the following questions:

“First. -Is the Act in question violative of the Fourteenth Amendr mént to the Federal Constitution in denying to railroad corporations the equal protection of the laws in that it applies’to railroad corporations only and does not apply to individuals, partnerships,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Receiver v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. StevensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. CoppesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Stevenson v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API