Legal Opinion
Paxton v. Brinton
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 1901No. 26PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of a patent. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The hill of complaint alleges infringement of the first four claims of patent No. 521,218, dated June 12, 1894, issued to John B. Paxton and Ellis I. O’Neill, for “fashioning-device for circular knitting machines.” These claims are as follows:
“(1) The combination with the needle cylinder, the cam cylinder, and actuating mechanism for said cam cylinder, of a rotatable needle shifter, capable of movement, in the direction of its axis of rotation, and actuating mechanism arranged with reference to said needle shifter, substantially as set forth, whereby movement of tlie…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reece Button-Hole Ma. Co. v. Globe Button-Hole Ma. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Bundy Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Time-Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Heap v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- Roemer v. PeddieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eck v. KutzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- Diamond Match Co. v. Ruby Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
- United States Peg-Wood, Shank & Leather Board Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Brinton v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904