Legal Opinion

Roemer v. Peddie

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 3, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This patent was held valid in Roemer v. Simon, 20 Fed. Rep. 197. No good reason for changing that conclusion has been made to appear, and it is followed now. The only question left Is whether the defendants infringe. The improvement patented consists essentially in extending the sides of the lock-case to hold the handle rings of traveling bags. The bottom plate of the lock had before been extended for that purpose. By the improvement the bottom plate could be dispensed with, and the side walls of the lock-case made both to inclose the lock and hold the handle rings. The defendants use the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Shewan & Sons v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1907
  2. Paxton v. BrintonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API