Legal Opinion

Diamond Match Co. v. Ruby Match Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided January 13, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 389,435, for a machine for making matches, granted to E. B. Beecher, September 11, 1888. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

This suit is based on letters patent issued to E. B: Beecher, September 11,1888, for a machine for making matches, which the defendants are charged with infringing. Starting with the block from which the match splints are to be produced, the machine in one continuous operation, by means, of its various devices and appliances, is able to,complete and deliver, ready fox *342use, 6,000,000 matches, with the help of one man, within the compass of an ordinary working day. Extraordinary as .is the result, the process is a reasonably simple one. The splints, as they , are cut,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. McCormick v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
  5. Smeeth v. Perkins & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  3. Gas Machinery Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Smith Cannery Machines Co. v. Seattle-Astoria Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API