Legal Opinion

Curry v. MEIJER, INC.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2009No. Docket 288187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motions for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). At issue is whether the trial court erred by ruling that MCL 600.2947(6)(a) of the Revised Judicature Act requires a plaintiff to establish a failure to exercise reasonable care to prevail on a breach *588of implied warranty claim against a nonmanufacturing defendant. We hold that such a showing is necessary and, because plaintiffs failed to meet this burden, summary disposition of plaintiffs’ complaint was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm..

I. BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. EliasonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Curry v. MEIJER, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Donald Andrews v. Fixel Law Offices PllcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Estate of Trask Simpson v. General Motors LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan v. Haier America Company, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API