Legal Opinion

Croskey v. BMW of North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2008No. 06-1386PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in an automotive products liability action in favor of defendants BMW of North America, Inc., a BMW distributor, and Bayer-ische Motoren Werk Aktiengesellschaft (BMW AG), the manufacturer. Plaintiff was injured when a plastic radiator piece on a 1992 BMW failed, releasing hot radiator fluid. On appeal, plaintiff alleges numerous errors at trial concerning eviden-tiary rulings and a jury instruction, most of which we reject. But, because the district court erroneously ruled that evidence of similar incidents could not be used…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. James A. McKinnon v. Skil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Arnold v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Victoria Jackson v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Jackson v. E-Z-Go Div. of Textron, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
  4. Jacobs v. Tricam Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  5. Curry v. MEIJER, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API