Legal Opinion
Schnitzler v. Green
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided March 5, 1897No. 682PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from Sedgwick District Court. Hou. C. Need, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtDennison, P. J.
This case is before the court upon a motion to dismiss, for the reason that no valid case-*657made or transcript of the record is attached to the petition in error.
The case was submitted to the court beiow upon the pleadings and agreed statement of facts, and judgment rendered thereon for the defendants in error, on December 31, 1895. The plaintiff in error filed a motion for a new trial on January 2, 1896, which motion was heard and overruled on January 4, 1896, and time was given the plaintiff in error to make and serve a case.
1. Motion for new trial unnecessary, when.
The defendants in error…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Horn v. Newton City BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Pierce v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler LinotypeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- First Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Durant v. NesbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.