Legal Opinion
Doolittle v. Fruehauf Corporation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 18, 1976No. W-413PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
332 So.2d 107 (1976)
Louise M. DOOLITTLE, Appellant (Defendant),
v.
FRUEHAUF CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee (Plaintiff).
No. W-413.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 1976.
Rehearing Denied June 11, 1976.
George L. Hudspeth and Jean C. Coker, of Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Herman Ulmer, Herman Ulmer, Jr., and Gary B. Tullis, of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, Jacksonville, for appellee.
MILLS, Judge.
Fruehauf sought specific performance of an option to purchase contained in a lease between it and Doolittle. Following a nonjury trial, a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Martin v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hunt v. First Nat. Bank of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- De Cespedes v. BolanosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Hammond v. DSY DEVELOPERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- A.M.R. Enterprises, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross v. United Postal Savings Association, a Missouri Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Fleming v. Burbach Radio, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.