Legal Opinion

Mulinix v. Sartin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 2007No. 103,840PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.

1 1 Danny Holly is a 58-year-old man who is partially incapacitated from a head injury he sustained in a motor vehicle accident in 1999. Mr. Holly's wife died and his daughter was seriously injured in the same accident. Because of the extent of Mr. Holly's injuries, a general guardian was appointed over his person and property. Although her injuries initially prevented her from serving as her father's general guardian, Mr. Holly's daugh*139ter, Ashely Holly Goodner, was appointed general guardian after she recovered. In the ensuing years, Mr. Holly was confined first to rehabilitation hospitals…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Towne v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Norman v. Trison Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. In Re Guardianship of DeereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. Henry v. DennerySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF S.A.H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API