Legal Opinion
Metzenbaum v. R.O.S. Associates
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1986No. B020257PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
Victor Metzenbaum (Metzenbaum or appellant), plaintiff in the underlying action for recovery of a commission as a mortgage loan broker, appeals from the judgment entered against him and in favor of R.O.S. Associates, Dwight E. Richardson, William H. O’Neill III, Larry A. Simmons, Sam Y. Shimoza, and John Sandling (collectively respondents) after the court granted respondents’ motion for a directed verdict.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a mortgage loan broker may recover the commission which a property owner agreed to pay him under an exclusive brokerage…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Dynasty Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. SealyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Crossroads Investors, L.P. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Addison v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.