Legal Opinion
Fleck v. Cablevision VII, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 1992No. Civ. 90-1041 SSHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions, plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint a third time and defendants’ motion for leave to amend their answer. Plaintiffs seek to add Catherine Warburton as a plaintiff. Defendants seek to add the statute of limitations as a defense to the second amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the plaintiffs’ motion and denies defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs David H. Fleck and Carol L. Couchenour were limited partners in Cablevision Associates VII (the Partnership), an Iowa limited partnership…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. Historic Figures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Estate of John Doe v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Olech v. Village of WillowbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Silvious v. Snapple Beverage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Fleck v. Cablevision VII, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.