NOLM, LLC v. County of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The issue in this appeal is whether a deed may be reformed in favor of a unilaterally mistaken party who bears the risk of the mistake, when the opposing party was aware of the mistake and sought to use it against the mistaken party. Because we conclude that these circumstances warrant reformation, we affirm the district court’s reformation order, but we remand for a partial refund to the non-mistaken party.
FACTS
After constructing five lanes of roadway as part of the Desert Inn Arterial across a portion of real property, Clark County sought to sell the remnant portions of two parcels…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NealNevada Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Arnold v. KipNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Delgado v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.