Legal Opinion

Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 22, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 95-08-01024Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

Before the court is the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 97-127 (Sept. 10, 1997) [hereinafter “Second Remand Results”]. Familiarity with the court’s earlier decisions in this case is presumed.1 The issue before the court involves Commerce’s implementation of the following instructions:

apply the totality of the circumstances test as articulated in [United States v.]Carborundum[, 536 F.2d 373, 377 (C.C.P.A. 1976)] by considering as many of the seven…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. Granges Metallverken AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Timken Co. v. ReganUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  4. Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API