Legal Opinion

Fradley v. Hyland

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 1, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. On appeal from district court. Libel by one Fradley against Hyland for supplies furnished one Gibson, respondent’s agent in charge of a ca,nal-boat. Decree for libelant as to the first cause of action, and respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The libel sets forth two causes of action for supplies purchased by one Gibson. The district court decreed in favor of the libelant upon the first cause of action, and dismissed the libel as to the other. The respondent in the court below is the appellant here, but the libelant, although he has not appealed from the part of the decree by which the libel as to the second cause of action was dismissed, cites the case of Irvine v. The Hesper, 122 U. S. 256, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1177, and insists that he is entitled to urge that this court should decree in his favor as to that cause of action. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irvine v. the HesperSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hale v. ParmleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Clealand v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Taft v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Thomas v. AtkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. American Fund for Public Service, Inc. v. Associated Textiles, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Senor v. Bangor Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API