Legal Opinion

Berry v. Chase

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for tlie Western District of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, Circuit Judge

The plaintiffs below were a firm of stockbrokers engaged in business in New York. The action was brought to recover an alleged loss arising upon a sale and purchase of Northern Pacific stock by direction of a firm of stockbrokers doing business at Memphis under the firm name of Schloss, Miller & Malone. The defendant W. J. Chase is sued as the undisclosed principal for whom the Meni-*626phis brokers acted. There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiffs sold on March 30, 1901, on a New York Exchange, 25 shares of Northern Pacific stock for and on account of Hogan & Co., a firm of Memphis…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Wilhite v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Mullinix v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Browne v. ThornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Beal v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API