Legal Opinion

Senor v. Bangor Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 7, 1954No. 11104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity case presenting a Pennsylvania controversy between a seller of certain goods and a purchaser of the same goods who did not deal with each other, but rather with a third person as a result of whose improper conduct and financial irresponsibility one of the present parties must bear a loss. The .district court found that the defendant buyer was not liable to the plaintiff seller either for goods bought and sold or -on a check given to the seller by the wrongdoer. The plaintiff has appealed.

These are the facts. At the time in question the demand for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Geo. K. Hubbard & Co. v. Tenbrook & BroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. York County Bank v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  4. R. R. v. . SimpkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. W. A. Simpkins Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  2. Sheppard v. NicholasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API