Senor v. Bangor Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity case presenting a Pennsylvania controversy between a seller of certain goods and a purchaser of the same goods who did not deal with each other, but rather with a third person as a result of whose improper conduct and financial irresponsibility one of the present parties must bear a loss. The .district court found that the defendant buyer was not liable to the plaintiff seller either for goods bought and sold or -on a check given to the seller by the wrongdoer. The plaintiff has appealed.
These are the facts. At the time in question the demand for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Geo. K. Hubbard & Co. v. Tenbrook & BroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- York County Bank v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- R. R. v. . SimpkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Southern Railway Co. v. W. A. Simpkins Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Sheppard v. NicholasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974