Legal Opinion

Holt v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1933No. 4311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The point presented for decision is that of whether or not in the facts shown there was error in giving a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict against the plaintiffs in error. It was conclusively shown that in 1924 there was duly entered a judgment of revivor which restored to its original force by statutory proceeding a judgment rendered in 1914 foreclosing a vendor’s lien and ordering that the land be sold at public auction by judicial sale, and that the proceeds be applied in payment of the amount determined to be due. It was upon the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Smith v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baker v. ClepperTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Nass v. ChadwickTexas Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Collins v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Lotus Oil Co. v. SpiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Polk v. Holland Texas Hypotheek BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Brimberry v. First State Bank of AvingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Dean v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District Number TwoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API