Legal Opinion

Nass v. Chadwick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1888No. 2572PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Waller. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Burkhart.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

On a former day of this term the Statement of facts was stricken from the record in this cause. ÍA11 such assignments of error and propositions as relate to the Admission of evidence or its sufficiency to sustain the judgment will therefore be passed over without consideration. The only ¡•question we can consider is whether the judgment rendered -below was such as could be rendered under the pleadings, had 'every allegation been established by the evidence.

The pleadings disclose a case where the plaintiff below sold to the defendant a tract of two hundred acres of land…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. G. W. Tom & Wife v. WollhoeferTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Coddington v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Burson v. BlackleyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ransom v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ogburn-Dalchau Lumber Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Holt v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Jenkins v. Northwestern Pipe & Supply Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Berryman v. FlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Golden West Oil Co. No. 1 v. Golden Rod Oil Co. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API