Legal Opinion
Harris v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 11, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-1425PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Petitioner Ronnie L. Harris claims that he is “actually and factually innocent of the retaliatory Maryland charges of which the United States Parole Commission based its revocation of . parole,” and he seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Pet. of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 2254(e)(2)(b), ECF No. 1.) For the following reasons, this Court will DISMISS this case for want of jurisdiction.
First of all, although Harris’s petition appears to be based on a revocation of parole that was executed by the state of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stokes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Rooney v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeong Seon Han v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Carter v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Dorothy Spears and Leroy Spears v. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.