Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 9, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-2170Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RONNIE LIONEL HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 15-2170 (RDM) UNITED STATES, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Ronnie Harris, proceeding pro se, brought a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he was actually innocent of his Maryland state conviction, as well as claims of “[r]etaliatory prosecution,” “[a]ctual conflict of interest of defense counsel,” and “[p]unishment [p]rior [t]o [c]onviction.” Dkt. 1 at 4. This Court dismissed the petition for want of jurisdiction. See Mem.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Stokes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API