Legal Opinion
Viola v. O'DELL
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 1, 2008No. AC 28612PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs, John Viola and Viola Realty, LLC, appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Frederick O’Dell. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that they had failed to demonstrate that they could have succeeded on the merits of their underlying zoning appeal had the defendant filed an appellate brief in a timely manner and (2) failed to consider certain allegedly dispositive evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts gave rise to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Alexandru v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrne v. BurkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Curley v. KaiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Anderson v. DikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Gray v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Luciani Realty Partners v. North Haven Academy, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.