Gray v. Weinstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiff, Bennie Gray, Jr., appeals from the summary judgment, rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Burton Weinstein and the law firm of Weinstein, Weiner, Ignal, Napolitano & Shapiro, P.C., in the plaintiffs action for legal malpractice. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude him from litigating the issue of whether Weinstein’s failure to move to withdraw the plaintiffs plea of nolo contendere in a prior criminal proceeding caused the plaintiff harm. Specifically, the plaintiff argues (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heyse v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Willey v. BugdenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013