Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Kimble

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2002No. 2001-2118PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Charlotte Kimble, and appellee, Mike Kimble, were married on April 1, 1976, and divorced on January 14, 2000. Pursuant to the divorce decree, appellee was required to pay appellant spousal support in the amount of $150 per week for six years. The decree specifically provided that the court would not retain jurisdiction over the issue of spousal support.

{¶ 2} Appellant remarried on September 2, 2000. Following her remarriage, appellee filed a motion to terminate spousal support. The matter was heard by a magistrate, who granted appellee’s motion.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In re AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dunaway v. DunawayOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Petro v. GoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Performing Arts School of Metropolitan Toledo, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Shell v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Licensing BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fradette v. Gold (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Kimble v. KimbleOhio Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API