Dunaway v. Dunaway
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the remarriage of one party to a divorce terminates the other party’s duty to pay sustenance alimony where the divorce decree provides for the payment of sustenance alimony for an indefinite period of time. For the reasons that follow, we hold that defendant’s remarriage terminated plaintiff’s obligation to pay sustenance alimony after her remarriage.
At the time of the parties’ divorce in 1977, Wolfe v. Wolfe (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 399, 75 O.O. 2d 474, 350 N.E. 2d 413, held that a trial court impliedly reserved jurisdiction to modify a sustenance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Cary v. CarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- McClain v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keller v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Kimble v. KimbleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Kimble v. KimbleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bachelder v. Bachelder, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Yeazell v. Yeazell, Unpublished Decision (8-4-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000