Legal Opinion

Starr v. Holck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1947No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 43,591PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

Plaintiffs in this action seek a decree for the specific performance of an option for the purchase of certain real estate in the city of Rockford, Michigan. The trial court granted the relief sought and defendants have appealed. Said option was incorporated in a written lease of the property which the defendants, as owners, executed to the plaintiffs July 7, 1943. The instrument demised the premises for a term of one year from and after the first day of July, preceding its execution.

The lease, which was largely in printed form, required plaintiffs to pay the sum of $420 for the term…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Stone v. St. Louis Stamping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. McComb v. McCombMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API