Legal Opinion

State, Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Morton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2005No. S-11672PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The ■ Alaska Division of Retirement and Benefits terminated the occupational disability benefits of a former public employee who did not recover from his injury and did not return to public employment but who managed to earn more than his former salary. Benefits were terminated pursuant to a Division policy that was unwritten but had been enforced since before the employee’s date of hire. Under that policy, known as the “75% rule,” an employee is no longer eligible for benefits if he earns outside income of more than 75% of his former salary. The Public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Holmberg v. State, Division of Risk ManagementAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bruner v. PetersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Greenpeace, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Alaska Center for the Environment v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Harrod v. State, Dept. of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Allen v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public AssistanceAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jones v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Allen v. STATE, DHSS., PUBLIC ASSISTANCEAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API