Brumer v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
This appeal arises from an action for inverse condemnation. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged an impairment of access from their property onto Flower Street caused by the construction of the Long Beach-Los Angeles Rail Transit Project known as the “Blue Line.” The trial court found no substantial impairment of access and denied relief. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Plaintiffs, Stanley Brumer and Gloria M. Brumer, as trustees of the Brumer Living Trust, are the owners of property located at the northeast comer of Flower Street and Venice Boulevard in.Los Angeles (the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Price Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- City of Livermore v. BacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Liontos v. County Sanitation DistrictsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Perrin v. Los Angeles County Transportation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.