Hadley v. Arms & Scott

— The evidence, to sustain respondents’ case, brought for damages to respondent wife.and the automobile of respondents, was challenged, both at the end of respondents’ case and at the conclusion of all the evidence, on the ground that no actionable negligence was shown as against appellant. Respondents allege, and introduced evidence to sustain, substantially the following cause of action:

On February 9,1924, Mrs. Hadley, with three friends in her automobile, was driving in the car of respond ents north, on Sixth avenne, in Seattle, until she reached Stewart street. It was about 2 o’clock p.…