Foulk v. Donjon Marine Co Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal involves two questions: (1) whether we have jurisdiction of it, and (2) whether an individual is precluded from being a “seaman” for purposes of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, if his relationship with a barge/diving station in question is only 10 days in duration. On the first issue, we will deny appellee/third-party defendant, Breakwaters International, Inc.’s, motion to dismiss the appeal. We find that the pleadings and actions of the parties were sufficient to invoke admiralty jurisdiction for purposes of Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Layne B. Foulk Marjorie E. Foulk, H/w v. Donjon Marine Company, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Breakwaters International, Inc., Third-Party Donjon Marine Company, Inc., in 97-5235. Layne B. Foulk Marjorie E. Foulk, in 97-5269Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Davis v. Levy, Angstreich, Finney, Baldante, Rubenstein & Coren, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- STIEF v. ROBESON TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021