Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. KUNITZ

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 2004No. C044133PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, Acting P. J.

Defendants Maxmillian Levee Kunitz and Anna Maria Lopez appeal following their guilty plea convictions of four counts each of forcibly committing a lewd or lascivious act upon a child. (§ 288, subd. (b)(1).) They contend that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering that the imposed $6,400 restitution and parole revocation fines be payable jointly and severally. They request that the judgment be modified to reflect separate $3,200 restitution and parole revocation fines payable individually. Since this contention has merit, we shall grant the requested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. MadranaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. BrunetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. The People v. GuillenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API