People v. Chambers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
We hold that a restitution fine imposed at the time probation is granted survives the revocation of probation. In this case, the *821trial court imposed a $200 restitution fine when it granted the defendant probation, but it also imposed a $500 restitution fine later when the defendant’s probation was revoked. Since the first restitution fine survived the revocation of probation, the second restitution fine was unauthorized. Accordingly, we modify the judgment by striking the second restitution fine and affirm the judgment as modified.
Procedure
In 1993, the defendant pleaded no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. Paul R.California Court of Appeal · 1996
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.