Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Desanti

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 26, 1980No. File 16282PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPickett, J.

The plaintiff, Robert Bailey, Jr., a minor, acting by his father, Robert Bailey, brought this action to recover damages against the defendants, Clarence DeSanti, Herman Klien and Helen Klien, for injuries sustained on August 20, 1976, when Robert, Jr., was bitten by a dog owned by DeSanti. A default judgment was entered against the owner on May 3, 1979, and the case is now before the court as to Mr. and Mrs. Klien.

The sole issue on the question of liability is whether the Kliens harbored or kept the dog owned by their son-in-law, DeSanti, and are thereby liable under the provisions of §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Larsen v. MacDonaldConnecticut Superior Court · 1937

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shields v. WagmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Murphy v. BuonatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Buturla v. St. OngeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Maccarone v. HawleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Goddard Ex Rel. Goddard v. WeaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API