Legal Opinion
Solomen v. Redwood Advisory Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 31, 2002No. 2:00-cv-00858PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPLANATION AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
In this pregnancy discrimination case, plaintiff Cheryl Solomen (“Solomen”) alleges that she was terminated from her job at defendant Redwood Advisory Company (“Redwood”) due to her 1997 pregnancy. Solomen brings claims under both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) (1994), and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. § 951 et seq.
Factual Background 1
In 1990, Solomen began working at Rouse & Associates, the company responsible for managing the retail shopping area at the Shops at Liberty Place. (Solomen…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Milka Anderson v. Boeing CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Briggs v. Women in Need, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- KIPP, Inc. v. Kimberly Whitehead, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Greenan v. Board of Educ. of Worcester CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Kubik v. Central Michigan University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.