Legal Opinion
United States v. Sammy Cariola
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 3, 1963No. 14347_1PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEEL, District Judge.
In 1938 petitioner served a 24-hour sentence imposed by the District Court of New Jersey after pleading guilty to a “technical violation” of the Mann Act, then 18 U.S.C. § 398, now 18 U.S.C. § 2421. In 1962 he filed in the same court a verified document styled “Petition for a Writ of Coram Nobis” which prayed that the conviction and sentence be vacated. The petition alleged that petitioner originally pleaded “not guilty” and had gone to trial, that after the Government had rested, although petitioner was of the belief that the Government had failed to adduce any evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Amos Salmon, No. 90-3355, Raymond E. Washington, No. 90-3363, Richard Fitzpatrick, No. 90-3366, John Surratt, No. 90-3438Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Epifanio Trujillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.